Impact of microplastics on marine environment & a cheap method for optimal extraction

Microplastics are small and barely visible pieces (ranging between 0.1 µm and 5 mm) of plastic that pollute the environment through man-made activities. They have been widely studied, and known to form after fragmentation of large pieces of plastics which have deteriorated in quality after a long period of exposure and shedding. They cause a lot of pollution, and have grabbed global attention as one of the major causes of marine pollution resulting from exponential increase in production of plastics for beneficial uses.

Coppock et al. (2017) cited several studies which reported the following statistics related to production and deposition of microplastics:

• within the past 75 years, plastic production in the world has drastically increased from 1.5 million tonnes/year to 322 million tonnes/year

• in the year 2010 alone, between 4 million and 12 million tonnes of plastic were estimated to have been deposited in the marine environment from land-based activities

• there has been reports of widespread debris of microplastics in deep seas, open oceans, at the poles, and at shorelines in many parts of the world.

Also, Miller et al. (2017) cited several studies which reported the following:

• by the year 2015, over 300 million metric tonnes of petroleum-based plastics were produced worldwide. Most of this quantity contained 6 main types of plastics: polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane, and polystyrene

• the rate of annual production of plastics would lead to a cumulative production of 33 billion metric tons by the year 2050; this implies that there would be mass production and increase in the quantity of microplastics along shorelines, and in oceans

• between 4.8 and 12.7 metric tons of plastic debris is being deposited in oceans each year; this quantity of pollution creates the possibility for organic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carcinogenic polychlorinated biphenyls, polybrominated diphenyl ethers and toxic metals to enter the marine food web.

Negative impact of microplastics on marine environment:

Among different categories (for e.g., megaplastics, macroplastics, mesoplastics, microplastics and nanoplastics) of marine plastic pollution, microplastics are of major concern because they are readily and easily consumed by organisms living in marine environments. Unknowingly, microplastics can also be consumed by mussels, crabs, oysters, fish, and even humans.

Ingestion of microplastics can have negative effects on food intake and decrease the amount of energy needed for reproduction and growth of aquatic species. Microplastics are sources of chemical contamination because they contain additives and plasticizers added during production of plastics. Studies have revealed that plastic litter/debris contains harmful pollutants that are about a million times more than pollutants in seawater; the intake/digestion of this could result in negative impacts on marine life.

Brief review of existing separation techniques for extraction of microplastics from marine environments:

Several researches showed that the principle of density flotation is commonly employed in separating less dense plastic polymers from denser sediment particles, and a range of high density salt solutions have been employed in extracting microplastics from marine sediments; however, existing methods have been known to show a number of drawbacks:

• they are expensive

• their extraction efficiencies are low

• they are not compatible with sediments that are very fine

• they are complex and inhibited by impracticalities or inefficiencies

One major challenge has been the unsettling of settled sediments which occurs at periods when floating microplastics are being removed. Typically, this has led to low extraction efficiencies and caused extractions to be repeated. In some other methods, several steps need to be taken in order to extract microplastics; such steps might require equipment that are only suitable for extracting coarse sediments. One example of such methods is the elutriation step which paves a way for clogging whenever very fine sediments are used; because of these reasons, there’s a need to promote a cheap and convenient method using zinc chloride (ZnCl2) as highlighted in the study carried out by Coppock et al. (2017).

Proposed extraction method, and stages employed:

Coppock et al. (2017) constructed a prototype of the popular Munich Plastic Sediment Separator (MPSS). Typically, the original MPSS isolates microplastics above a shut-off valve and achieves 95.5% recovery rates of microplastics that are less than 1 mm in size. The typical MPSS is 1.75 meters high, made of stainless steel, and was initially designed with the intention of taking up large quantities of sediment (6 kg); however, MPSS is quite expensive to produce and is less feasible and portable, especially when numerous replicates of small sediment samples have to be used.

In order to cut down expenditure and achieve equal or higher recovery rates, a cheap, small-scale and portable microplastic extraction unit was constructed and designed to mirror the original MPSS. This prototype was used to assess the viability and financial cost involved in extracting microplastics using 3 high-density salt solutions: sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium iodide (NaI) and zinc chloride (ZnCl2).

It was observed that this method is less expensive, and can be used on a wide range of sediment types to extract microplastics from marine sediment samples. Before assessments and comparisons were made between the 3 methods, and a conclusion was arrived at that the study involving zinc chloride (ZnCl2) is cheap and can be used for optimal extraction of microplastics, the following stages were employed in the method highlighted by Coppock et al. (2017):

(1) Three separate media were prepared for floatation

(2) A prototype sediment-microplastic isolation (SMI) unit was constructed

(3) The SMI unit was cleaned, purged and primed

(4) Extraction of microplastics was carried out on 3 different sediment samples: each contained NaCl, NaI and ZnCl2, respectively

Obseravtions:

After construction and application of the prototype unit using the method, the following were observed:

(1) Although saturated sodium chloride (NaCl) solution is cheap and adequate enough to extract low density plastics from marine sediments, using it in the constructed unit would not give an estimate of the actual quantity of abundant microplastics found in a marine environment containing microplastics that are highly dense.

(2) Although sodium iodide (NaI) solution can be used to prepare higher density sediment samples than NaCl, it is the most expensive option in preparing high density samples; based on this, it was eliminated from the sediment trial samples prepared for extraction in the study.

(3) Zinc chloride (ZnCl2) solution is the cheapest and most inexpensive method that can be used to prepare high density samples (greater than 2 g/cm3) for extraction. For this reason, ZnCl2 was used in a number of previous studies to quantify microplastics.

Conclusion:

It can be observed that for high density samples involving NaI, fine sediments in the SMI method were in suspension, and this made the method inefficient for optimal extraction of microplastics. When the inefficiency of sodium chloride (NaCl) to extract highly dense microplastics, and the high cost involved in using sodium iodide (NaI) to prepare high density samples are both considered and comparedd with zinc chloride (ZnCl2), results show that the solution of ZnCl2 is the cheapest and the most appropriate for floating microplastics when using SMI unit to extract them from marine sediments.

In summary, the method involving ZnCl2 is the best one for extracting microplastics because it is cheap, convenient and can recover up to 95.8% in a single step — a bit higher than the recovery rate for the original MPSS (which is 95.5%). Also, it would likely gain universal acceptance because it can fit into budgets. With further researches in this area, it might be possible to obtain 100% extraction of microplastics in the near future.

You may read other interesting articles by clicking the links below:

Why a sustainable amount of biofuels will be used as an alternative to jet fuel in 20 years’ time

The Importance of Self Discovery! Who Are You?

Talent is Only a Starting Point for Success: You’ve Got to Keep Working That Talent!

 

Advertisements

7 comments

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.